French revolution in Kerala -Montbeliarde cattle to the State

The state's milk production sector could soon be hosting a French revolution.The Kerala Livestock Development Board has signed a partnership agreement with UMOTEST-COOPEX, a cooperative of Montebeliarde cattle-breeding farmers in France, for improving the genetic stock of dairy cattle in Kerala.The cooperative agreed to provide 2,000 doses of frozen semen from 10 superior Montbeliarde bulls and 50 embryos of the breed for starting a technical programme in the State.

The memorandum of understanding with UMOTEST-COOPEX envisaged a cross-breeding programme, on a trial basis, for upgrading the genome base of Kerala cattle. It also proposed to establish a small nuclear herd of pure Montbeliarde breed for a breeding programme and study the adaptability of the breed in the climate and management conditions of Kerala. The cattle would be reared at the farms of KLD Board at Mattupetty and Kolahalamedu (Vagamon) where the climate was similar to that of France.

This historic deviation from the breeding policy of the state was finalised at a meeting of Mr. C. Divakaran (Minister for Animal Husbandry, Kerala), Sr.P.K Mohanty (Secretary, Animal Husbandry) and Dr.Ani.S.Das (Managing Director, KLD Board) with the Secretary-General from the French Ministry of Agriculture. During April 2010, the Director of International Co-operation, French National Livestock Technical Institute has arrived in Kerala and met KLDB officials.  His visit was sequele to the visit by the Kerala Minister and MD KLD Board and their keen interest in drawing upon French experience for increasing local production at the "Space 2008 World Cattle Fair" held in Rhennes, France, last year.

Regarding the move to introduce the Montbeliarde cattle to the State, the Editor  have posed a few questions to the Minister (AH), MD (KLD Board),  APC, Director of Animal Husbandry, MD (MILMA) and the Director (Dept. of Dairy development). The MD of KLD Board, instead of replying to the questions, asked me to check the website. But no URLs were suggested by him.

  1. Is the decision to introduce the Montbeliarde breed in tune with the cattle breeding policy of the State of Kerala?
  2. Do you think that this new breed is superior in milk production, fat percentage and conducive to the climatic conditions of Kerala? Any documentary proof to that?
  3. Do you plan of evolving a new breed through cross breeding of Montbeliarde with desi breeds of India?
  4. How did you arrive at the decision to try with Montbeliarde breed alone when other superior breeds are available around the globe?
  5. Was it not an impulsive decision arrived at during the cattle fair by the Minister and the MD of KLD Board?
  6. Did you take the scientists, veterinarians, farmers, farmers' organizations/cooperatives, and related government departments into confidence before taking this decision?
  7. What is the cost involved in procuring the frozen semen and embryos?
  8. Did the Government of India give nod for the import of germplasm?

Since the persons at the helm of affairs did not care to answer to the questions, we have requested a few experts in the related areas and the scientists from KAU to clear the doubts of the common peasant and the veterinarians alike. Hope some of them will respond. Wait for their comments………..

Comments

Dogs do not bark and the caravan goes on..(Dr.John Kuruvilla)

'Montbeliard': Dogs do not bark and the caravan goes on..... (comment posted by Dr John Kuruvilla: 30 Nov 2010 : 08:20am)

Even though the experts rejected the KLDB move to import the semen and embryos of the French cattle breed(Please read this report in 'Indian Express dated 27 Sat 2010), they are going on with it. Experts like Dr Soasamma Iype and Prakash Kalarikkal have rejected this move (in this press report) pointing out the envisaged breeding programme with 'Montbeliarde' is on wrong track and would end up in the similar disaster which the cattle breeders or farmers are even now suffering from !!

No detailed discussions took place prior to signing MoU with the French Dairy Co-op. Now who will bell the cat? Why not the other 'experts' in the Universty are coming out with their opinions? Is that they will get some meat cuts to eat when the caravan goes on (that is why they are not barking at all) ?           

Dr John Kuruvilla

Article on 'Vechur' cow in 'Malayalam Varika' dated 3rd Sept

An article on the necessity of conservation of 'Vechur' cows is in Malayalam Varika dated 3rd Sept. 2010 written by G.Nirmala. Please read it..

Dr John Kuruvilla

PR exercise on Montbeliarde for KLD Board

Though Dr.Ani.S.Das is reluctant to clarify on the points and remove the apprehensions of the veterinarians and scientists at this forum, he is smart enough to take the dairy farmers, media and general public in to confidence through his PR exercises. Read on the translated version of the article appeared in Malayala Manorama, the latest in the series.

Montbeliarde cattle and Kerala's Dairy Sector: A dream comes true: Dr.D Shine Kumar

 

Finally, the long wait of Kerala for new cattle generation is over. The Montbeliarde cattle from the banks of Seine (France) are about to be launched in Kerala as saviors of the dairy farmers who were silently suffering from the miseries resulted out of the clichéd breeding policy and the poor milk production through the decades. The germ plasm of the new cattle breed is brought to Kerala by the KLD Board.

Milk production (that ranges from 30 to 60 litres per day) tops the merit list of this attractive breed with tan patches over ivory body color. The Kappa Casein rich milk of this breed can boast of the 4% fat, 3.5% protein and an average production of 7750 litres. The breed is known for its mastitis resisting capabilities and can be reared for milk production with enriched straw and hay.

The breed is reputed for beef production too. While the bulls weigh up to 1200 Kgs, the cows will fetch up to 600 kgs. of meat.  With a deficit over 5 lakh litres of milk per day, Kerala is bewildered over the shrinking agricultural land and grazing area. Cattle breeds that can produce more milk from lesser cultivable area of land are the need of the hour. And this state of affairs prompted the Government of Kerala to eye on the Montbeliarde cattle that can take on the deficiencies of the present cattle wealth of Kerala.

On receiving the nod to proceed on formulating an understanding with the Livestock Institute (France) and the Paris Agricultural Research Institute, the Minister for Animal Husbandry, Kerala met the Secretary General of the Department of Agriculture (France) and reached an agreement on the import of the germ plasm of the breed. Two thousand frozen semen units and fifty embryos are expected to reach Kerala shortly and hopefully, will give birth to calves at the Mattuppetty Farm of KLD Board. If everything goes right, the dairy farmers of Kerala will have the new generation Montbeliarde cattle within one year.

According to Dr. Ani.S.Das, Managing Director, KLD Board, “this is yet another experiment as was the case with the Jersey and Holstein-Fresian breeds, and we can expect miracles out of the cross breeding of our own cattle with the pure Montbeliarde breed”.  More information can be had from Kerala Livestock Development Board, Pattom, Thiruvananthapuram Tele: 0471 2440920

Montbeliarde cattle: Dr George Tharakan, NewZealand (on E-mail)

 

A few thoughts about the French breed introduction:

I have been in the large animal practice, mainly dairy cattle practice in New Zealand for quite some time. (I’m doing only small animal medicine and surgery during the past four years). We haven’t got any of this French breed in this country. I was talking about this breed to one of my vet colleagues and friend  who is (originally from Europe )now associated with a  research project in New Zealand and according to him, this breed due to its overall quality of traits didn’t become popular in spite of their active marketing to outside world for the last 10--20 years.

This breed, according to him, has a low total milk production, they are mountain breeds. Meat quality and yield better.

I am not a person to comment anything on breeding practices, (I don’t know much or anything about it) since my forte was herd health, large animal medicine and surgery.

In fact it’s the specialists in dairy cattle reproduction can answer the questions about the introduction of this exotic genetic material and whether it’s the answer for the State of Kerala. If enough studies haven’t been done and the past breeding data haven’t been analysed properly by a panel of dairy cattle reproductive experts, we may not be doing the right thing.

As veterinarians we have a duty to advise the public / politicians in this type of decision making process. I don’t have an answer as to how this works. In short, an unbiased, in-depth study by an expert panel of a national level works on it and if their opinion is going to be accepted by the policy makers, then yes, it may be a fair move!

An abstract of an article which i read sometime back is here for the viewers:

Milk yields >10,000 kg/year are common in modern dairy production, owing to improved nutrition, management and genetic gains through the use of progeny-tested bulls. However, reproductive performance has decreased worldwide in many cows with a high genetic potential for milk production, particularly in the Holstein breed. Moreover, cow robustness and longevity is also threatened by increasing stress, udder health disturbances and of locomotion disorders. Genetic global misuse of a narrow base of AI sires -including those selected for high milk yield but not consequently for health and reproductive traits- has not only contributed to these undesirable effects on animal health and welfare but, together with sub-optimal management, jeopardized the ethical and economical sustainability of modern dairy farming.  Use of high-fertility sires, of balanced breeding programs with adequate trait measurements, diet optimization, design of buildings and management systems that best support reproduction as well as cross-breeding; are among short- and medium-term strategies. In a longer perspective, holistic- and trait-orientated research on interrelations between gene regulation of nutrition, lactation and stress is needed; aiming at identifying reliable and cheap markers to be used on-line and on-farm as recorders of genetic traits. Awaiting the full application of juvenile genomic selection, a wider inclusion of functional traits (fertility, health and longevity) and of product quality are mandatory for breeding programs in order to secure acceptable fertility, sustained milk production and the best welfare of dairy cows.

Solution: Increase the awareness among the vets and farmers about the need for an expert opinion before the policy makers jump into conclusions.

Introduction of French Breed.

Kerala State already had a planned breeding programme for dairy cattle since the inception of Indo-Swiss project. Sunadini cattle is the ultimate result of this programme and milk production in the state had gone up substatialy.I do not know the compelling reasons for fufther introduction of this French Breed into the germplasam and the authors do have any clear cut vision on its impact to the presentstock.Whether the introduction of this new French breed has been dicussed in the scientific and farmer communities before the decession is taken?.Whether this has been properly documented in the states breeding policy? all these are the moot points to be answered by the appropriate authority.I feel still more deliberations are required to arrive at a conclusion .More and more intelligent mind to come forward and open up on this topic.

Awesome blog. I enjoyed

Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!

 

 <a href="http://www.book-a-flat.com">apartment paris</a>

Good old Desi Cattle: Prayar Gopalakrishnan

 

(This article on the Desi Cattle Breeds appeared in ‘Mathrubhumi’ daily quite recently and gains significance in the eve of changes in the cattle breeding policies of Kerala. With the permission of the author, we have translated it from Malayalam…… and now for your comments:  Editor)

We are witnessing the frantic search for germplasm of exotic cattle breeds with high production potentials. Instead, a genetic engineering process to tap the potentials and the disease resistance capabilities of the desi cattle breeds is the need of the hour.

Cattle rearing are one of the proud heritages of ancient India. It was the livelihood of millions throughout India and a natural supporting system to the agricultural production. Cows were synonymous with sanctity and prosperity. Milk is the best balanced food and helps millions in health care. People considered splashing of water tinged with cow dung after cleaning of households to bring back the freshness. The ‘Panchagavyam’ is a mix of, milk, curd, ghee, cow urine and cow dung. Every body part of this animal as hide, bones, hooves, horns were used for various needs of man. Yes, cow was considered as the ‘Kama Dhenu”.

The diversity of India can be spotted in the array of cattle also. All are best suited to the people, places and climate of India. Tough the cows may be different in their colour, shape and sizes, the milk remain the same in colour and properties. The cows around the world are most known by their origin lands as Jersey, Swiss Brown, Vechur, Sindhi etc.

India is now the highest producer of milk. Since ancient times, India topped in the number of cattle and the number of breeds. The National Dairy Research Institute has documented more than fifty cattle breeds in India. 

Cows from Vechur, a small village near Kottayam could be considered as the own cattle breed of Kerala. The small size, low body weight, lesser feed intake etc. are the characteristics of this breed. Milk, though poor in quantity of production is rich in nutrient values. Small curved horns, fine and flowing skin and stout legs etc. are also some of the specialties of this desi breed. But this breed is on the verge of extinction after the decades of natural and cross breeding. Though late, animals of this breed could be spotted and conserved by Dr. Sosamma Iype and her colleagues of Kerala Agricultural University. The conservation efforts are going on.

‘Kapila’ is another rare desi cattle breed maintained by the ‘Thulu Brahmin’ people of South Canara region. They believe that the prosperity of their home will be gone forever once the ‘Kapila’ cow is sold out. According to the legends, ‘Kapila cow’ is born out the prayers of Kapila Maharshi.  The term “Kapila’ represents the blend of light yellow and ash colours. The calm and friendly cattle are also called ‘Kapila’ in Malayalam. Small head, short horns, low feed intake, and highly nutritious milk are considered as the specialties of this breed. Though the merits are laudable, this breed is not given its due recognition by the scientific community. Other notable desi cattle breeds of the Karnataka region are ‘Amrutmahal’ from Chikmagallur, ‘Hallikkar’ of Mysore, ‘Krishna’ of Krishnavalli, ‘Javari’ and ‘Killari’ of Bijapur.

The ‘Kankayam’ cattle breed of Coimbatore is more of work animals. The well-known desi cattle breeds of India are ‘Abalacherry’ of Thanchavur, ‘Barador’of Erode, ‘Aalampadi’ of Salem, ‘Red Kanthari’ of Kanthar (Maharashtra), ‘Gwala’ of Vidarbha, ‘Dangi’and ‘Divani’ of Nasik, ‘Kankrej’, ‘Raathi’, ‘Nagori’ and ‘Mevatti’  of Rajasthan, and the ‘Tharparkar’ of the deccans.

The list of desi cattle breeds of Indian region also includes ‘Haryana’ of Haryana-Hissar, ‘Gir’ of Gujarat, ‘Gangotri’ and ‘Bachor’ of Bihar, ‘Gwaliyor’ and ‘Malwi’ of Madhypradesh, ‘Nimari’ of Nimore, ‘Kenkath (Kenvarya) of Uttarpradesh, ‘Kiriga’ of Sikkim, ‘Ponwar’ of Himalayan belt, and the ‘Red Sindhi’ and ‘Sahiwal’ of Karachi.

The robust and stout legs, heat resistant skin and the perfectly balanced body shape of the desi cattle (‘Ongole’, ‘Dhoni’) were the prime reasons for their induction into the war zones along with the elephants and horses by the kings of India.  The desi cattle breeds as ‘Sindhi’, ‘Kankrej’ and ‘Sahiwal’ were taken back to Brazil in the earlier times during the trade of cashew and spices. They have taken the desi buffalo breeds as ‘Murrah’, and ‘Mehsana’.

The desi cattle breeds are blessed with their inherent abilities to resist the climatic variations and diseases. The unique fat globules of the milk from ‘Kapila’ and ’Vechur’ are said to have positive medical traits and cholesterol lowering properties. The desi breeds could digest almost anything from the agricultural by products and leftovers easily and hence need no special rations for maintenance. Hence rearing them is more economical. The local feeds with high proteins naturally attribute to more protein in their milk too. The only deficits often raised of the desi cattle breeds are the low milk production, high age of maturity, and the long inter-calving period.

The majority farmers of Kerala often maintain only a single cow in their households. And this system is limiting the possibilities of the ‘Intensive selection processes. The principle behind the Intensive Selection process is to select any top ten milk producers from among the hundred milch cattle, and A to further select ten toppers from among the hundred cattle of their next generation. This ongoing system of selecting the best is the uniqueness of the Intensive selection process.

The KLD Board, the once noted institution of India should be able to procure the advances in genetic engineering of the foreign countries and to pass them to the dairy farmers. Many of the foreign countries have reached the stage of micro manipulation, sexing and splitting of embryos, animal cloning and even gene transfers.

The ‘Nava Sunandini’ should be the product of the high milk producing potentials of the exotic breeds and the disease resistance and feed conversion capabilities of the desi cattle breeds. High tech management practices and high nutrient feeding alone will not yield positive results if are opting for the economical milk production. Even man cannot find enough food in the present times. It’s high time; the people at the helm of affairs review the decision to opt for the pure exotic cattle breeds with heavy body weight, high maintenance costs and poor disease resistance. Though the Hi-tech or some of the mini dairy may afford to maintain such breeds, it’s for sure that the common farmer will not be benefitted. What we need now is a one ‘Nava Sunandini’ with capabilities to withstand the climatic fluctuations and will produce reasonable quantity of milk under the present day limited physical conditions.  

WHY ARE WE SHYING AWAY FROM TRUTH

This topic has opened a debate. That is a good sign. We had discussed many things and many known veterinarians have participated (some through old interviews) in this. Atleast some vets agreed that inter-calving period is to be reduced which is too long(the area where vets expertize  needed). Understanding the correct time of ovulation and condition of  the ovaries and uterus is a must for a sucessful insemination, and correction of problems if any. How competent are we in these examinations and executing  proper insemination ? How much we have tried to improve our skill ? Was there any refresher training ?  I happened to hear from some final year students while I was in service that they could not do PR examinations because of some tussle between farm in charge and Dept of G&O in KAU at that time. The best semen, feed and breed will not deliver a calf unless the person performing AI is profecient 

Cross breeding - status of Kerala

I do not think that any body in the world has more experience in cross breeding - leading to mass genetic change - than Kerala. We could launch a very systematic cross breeding programme during sixties on cattle of rather no worth as far as milk production is concerned. The impact was tremendous in the first phase of the programme; 5 fold increase of milk, 100% increase in the size of cattle, slower than expected but steady increase in the management ability of farmers, emergence of strong net work of milk marketing, invigorated  status for veterinarians in the society - to name a few. But the organizational set up changed for  growing side effect needs, more Govt sponsored programmes set their foot on related but short time important needs forgetting the main issue of long term improvement programme of cattle breeding through cross breeding.

Looking back there could be  seen evident but small mistakes done in the implementation but by and large the programme was unique, strong based and sound. Remnant is still there but overshadowed with short term, publicity based and weak plans.

Can we ever improve our crossbred cattle without a strong, unbiased progeny testing programme if we want to retain local blood level for undisputed and well known qualities?. Is our political frame work congenial for such a testing plan which should run for minimum 50 years? The organizational structure leading such a scheme should be capable of withstanding unintentional but powerful enemies  diluting the effect for short term satisfaction of publicity craze. Also important is withstanding the greed for  free fund (with string) offered either by international or national agencies which will affect the impact. The organizational structure in my humble opinion should be powerful just like ISRO or similar organization understanding the far reaching ultimate result. Of course in such a case the testing policy needs involvement of smaller number of farmers and stronger organized sector. The breed thus emerged will be acceptable not only in our India but also in many nations where high producing pure breeds of Europe or USA is a burden.

The change in  pattern of cow breeding in the last 10 years in Kerala should not escape our attention

The first point is the realization of the value of such a programme and then taking the powers that be into confidence.

Abraham Mathew

Very interesting discussion.I

Very interesting discussion.I think crossbreeding is a popular world wide strategy for genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Please inform  about any Successful crossbreeding policies in the world which can be used as a model for us.

Dr.P.O.Abraham (on E-mail)

 

Don’t know anything about the production potential and other parameters of the so called Montbeliyarde breed. I don’t have any ready access for reference and this breed is not heard of in our times. I don’t know whether the Govt. have had enough  and perspective discussion with competent persons in and outside the  state or even with credible foreign experts on animal breeding before arriving at a decision  of this magnitude which has far reaching consequences. Any how this is a subject for careful scrutiny and unbiased decision with in-depth application of mind. I appreciate your interest and patriotism. Only so much from a small person like me in the field of  animal genetics and breeding. 

Dr.V.Rama Kumar's comments ( as E-mail to the Editor)

Dr.V.Rama Kumar (Former Secretary General, VCI) has politely refused to make any blanket comment. Instead, in his E-mail to the Editor, he advised to take note of his attached article on "Causes and consequence of shortage of milk in Kerala; Who gains?" especially the the highlighted portions. Since those views are relevant in the present context, we are reproducing them here for you.

 

KLD Board should have made a matter of fact impact assessment and evaluation of its breeding policy from time to time. In 80’s expert panel of FAO/ UNEP observed that cross breeding over 3-4 decades (now > 6 decades) did not result in a wide spread improvement in performance. In many cases cross-breeding has been carried out without initial characterization or evaluation of indigenous breeds and with no effort to conserve local strains. Uncharacterized breeds are disappearing in some rapidly developing regions of the world where climatic, parasitic or disease pressures could have produced important genetically adapted breeds.” Pre-independence records reveal that the then Animal husbandry commissioner of India Sir Arthur Oliver had advised the then British rulers of India against introducing British breeds into India. Similar was the view of Sir Kothewala, an Animal Husbandry commissioner who succeeded him later.

With the reports of “Mad cow disease” in England and Europe, government of India banned the import of biomaterial. Now import can be done only from countries that are declared “free of disease” by the international agency “Office Internationale Epizootie” (O.I.E) for the past 5 years. It is in public interest to verify how central government permits import by Kerala?

Import of Montbeliarde Cattle to Kerala and Use for Breeding

As Editor JIVA you had interviewed me and I had expressed my views about the   implementation of the cattle breeding policy about 17 years back while I was a member of the Breeding policy Committee of the State. My opinion and comments were published with facts and figures in the journal. Also other related articles. I still hold those views. Some more points are :

First let me give a comparison of Montbeliarde cattle and the exotic breeds already used in Kerala.

Montbeliarde breedof Cattle .The French cattle breed Montbeliarde has its roots in Switzerland from where the Brown Swiss originated. But the present Montbeliarde breed was evolved in the Haute Saône-Doubs region of France. They are a dairy and meat breed belonging to the French Red Pied group.

 

1.Comparison:

Figures below show that Montbeliarde has double the weight of Jersey .More than Holsteins and very comparable with Brown Swiss.   Milk production -comparatively low.

 

 

Montbeliarde

 

 

Jersey

 

Brown Swiss

Holstein US

Lactation Milk production(kg)

6500*

7500

6860

10500

 

Cow

Bull

Cow        

Bull

Cow

Bull

Cow

Bull

Body weight(kg)

600-700**

1100-1200**

320-450

550-820

650-750

1000-1200

500-700

900-1270

 

 

   *Lowest milk production ** Highest body weight.

2.Background:  Government of Kerala had been using exotic breeds since 1961.It was Jersey in the beginning. Since the inception of Indo Swiss project it had been Brown Swiss. Then slowly Holstein Friesians were introduced. The exotic cattle of different breeds and importation from different countries continued for about 50 years. But what would another breed and further imports mean?

3.New strategy: Now the plan is to experiment with a new breed. It is only a year since the importation of Holstein bulls, semen and embryos from Israel was announced. Now it is from France and that also a heavy breed.   Brown Swiss from Switzerland was pulled out from the breeding programme due to its late maturity and high body weight. Does Kerala want to   repeat the    same experiment with French bulls now, instead of Swiss bulls?

4. A rethinking is necessary. What does Kerala need specifically? It is not milk cum meat animal? It is a cow for milk. Kerala does not have enough resource for heavy breeds. The new experiments are all at the cost of the farmer. Farmers are abandoning dairying in spite of the big government budgets in this sector. It is high time for Kerala to be independent now, instead of bringing in cows for projects like Vidarbha and others or exotic Germplasm including Montbeliarde breed.

 5. Conclusion.   If improving milk production in the State is the target. It cannot be achieved by using one of the heaviest breeds of the world.

Read the interview (JIVA Vol. II, Issue 1) with Dr. Sosamma Iype

As Dr. Sosamma Iype referred to the interview that appeared in the JIVA Vol.II, Issue No.1, we are reproducing it here for those who missed it. Interestingly, that interview initiated a heated but healthy discussion among the professionals at that time. But a few at the helm of affairs were rather sceptical. Read it now...

 

What went wrong with the breeding policy of the state?                 (The Editor and Associate Editor had a detailed discussion with Dr. Sosamma Iype, Professor and Head, Dept. of Genetics, Veterinary College, Mannuthy> Excerpts from that interview: Issue No.1, Vol.II, JIVA -1997)

 

More than sixty percentage of the cattle population of Kerala has become crossbred and the annual milk production has increased to 22.5 lakh tones. How do you evaluate this achievement?

The figures on the production of milk are seen misleading. As per the latest Cattle Census reports, we have around 12 lakh crossbred breedable females which can give around 1500 litres of milk per lactation. With an estimated inter calving period of 18 months, they will produce around 11 to 11.5 lakh tonnes per annum. We will get about 2 lakh tones of milk from 5 to 7 lakh non-descript cows at a rate of 600 kg of milk per lactation and with 20 month inter calving period. Buffaloes and goats will produce another 2 lakh tones. Put together these will make only around 15 to 16 lakh tones. This is much below the projected 22.5 lakh tones.

Even though the claim of production is disputed, the achievement of the dairy sector is remarkable. But the quantum jump noted in the earlier days, is not palpable recently, and the current pace is not encouraging. We have to concentrate on improving the total quantity of milk production, as well as improving the rates of fat and SNF. The existing required rates of fat and SNF are not up to the expectations of the farmers and even embarrassing situations arise out of the current rates and existing Food Adulteration Act.

Do you think that Brown Swiss will be the ideal exotic breed, which can be used for crossbreeding in Kerala conditions? What are your comments on the selection of exotic breed?

Brown Swiss is primarily a breed for meat rather than milk. The claim that people of Kerala are mostly non vegetarians and they can use the breed for meat purposes after availing three or four lactations is not substantial in the face of growing cost of maintenance. With low productivity and high cost of maintenance, Brown Swiss is not the ideal breed. We may go for jersey which is of smaller size and high producing, with good fat percentage or Holstein Frisian which is a much high producing breed.

Kerala has got a breeding policy. Do you think that this policy is good enough to cater to the challenges in crossbreeding and upgrading the cattle wealth in the year to come?

Any policy aimed at improving the production should concentrate on upgrading the genetic potential, conversion of non-descript animals to crossbreeds, reducing inter-calving period and better management practices. Our Government has appointed an expert committee to review the scenarios of Animal Husbandry activities in 1978. The committee submitted a detailed report in 1980. Milk marketing was delinked from KLD Board and the Board started concentrating on production of frozen semen and related research.

In 1988, the Government has appointed another committee under the chairmanship of Dr. G. Mukundan for evaluation of the livestock breeding programmes and formulation or modification of the breeding policies, based on research finding, experiences etc. This committee submitted its final report in 1992. Government discussed its observations with the members of the committee, eminent persons in the field, and the various implementing agencies and subsequently accepted its recommendations. The government also constituted a standing committee to monitor the progress of the implementation of the recommendations. These decisions came out as a Government order in September 1994.

Being a member of the policy formulating committee, I reminded the Government about the timely monitoring of the recommendations, but I gather that no meetings mere convened so far. So, What I want to make clear is that monitoring of the recommendations is equally important as that of formulating policies.

What are the major problems you find in the implementation of the breeding policy?

In the present breeding policy, detailed suggestions have been made on the means of increasing the genetic potential of the crossbreds through selection, limiting the exotic blood to around 50%. It was clearly mentioned that mating between crossbreds may result in reduction in milk yield of the progeny, unless absolute caution is observed in selection. The methods as young bull programme and progeny testing scheme of the KLD Board are being practised here. But the data on these programmes are often withheld from public scrutiny. Similarly instances as publishing of incorrect breeding values of bulls are noted. The present practice recommended by KLD Board of using semen from superior bulls to elite cows is violating the breeding policy. In the breeding policy, it is clearly states that the exotic blood may be in and around 50%, and in this scheme, elite cows with exotic blood of more than 50% is subjected to 100% exotic bull semen. This is evident from the official hand out of KLD Board on premium bulls, which states that imported semen of Holstein Frisian with breeding value of more than 8000 kg and Denmark jersey are supplied to inseminate elite cows.

Something seems wrong with the functioning of the semen producing agency?

I don't believe that there are more than a dozen cows in the KLD Board farms yielding above 4000 kg in a single lactation. Similarly the bulls belonging to the KLD Board used in the first phase of the scheme had dam's production ranging from 1536 to 2972 with an average of 2238 kg per lactation, the daughters average was only 1518 kg. The data presented by KLD Board cannot be relied upon as can be seen from the published sire summaries. Perusal of the sire summaries reveal that the four fold increase in breeding value consequent to the formation of the committee on evaluation of Breeding policies, appears to be a purposeful inflation of the breeding values. It can cause deleterious consequences on the states Livestock breeding sector. The burden of this distorted and deceitful scientific misinformation is taking a heavy toll on the poor dairy farmers, betraying all the trust and confidence he places in these information and is crippling the state's developing economy. This deceitful inflation appears to stem from the sole purpose of creating a market for KLD Board’s frozen semen.

But the number of inseminations is increasing and many other states come forward to buy KLD Board's frozen semen. What may be the reason?

Even though there is increase in the number of A I centres, there is decline in the requirement of number of doses of frozen semen. This may be due to the inferior quality of the progeny produced by the use of frozen semen from KLD Board. In 1990-91, a total of 16 lakh doses of semen used through 1544 AI centres. In 1995 the demand for frozen semen came down to 15 lakh even though the number of A I Centres rose to 1925. These 15 lakh doses of frozen semen meet only 50% of the states breedable cattle population with an average conception rate of 2.5. There is only 2% increase in Artificial Insemination in ten years from 1986-96

Do you think that the management practices can compensate for the deficiencies in the crossbreeding policies?

Never, Genetic improvement along with better management practices can increase productivity. The present line of thinking that the need of the day is not further genetic improvement for milk production clearly shows the lack of concept on the need for genetic improvement. Even if it is to maintain the present level of milk production, it is necessary to have a continued selection programme. There a lot of criticisms from the farming community that the progenies in many cases yield less than their mother, even with the best management practices. So my suggestion is that we have to produce a cow with good genetic potential and give it the best environment.

What are your suggestions to overcome the present handicaps and improve the production in the coming years?

Fix the target of production at 3500 litres per lactation. The sires breeding value should be high. Good bull calves may be located. They are available especially at Thrissur. Proper recording systems may be implemented at the farmers’ levels and proper data may be pooled through the veterinary institutions. Milk recording system may be popularised. Create awareness among farmers on the choice of semen and educate them on better management practices. Proper monitoring of the recommendations of the breeding policy is absolutely essential. The implementation of the policies and functioning of the different agencies may be subjected to the scrutiny of neutral research and developmental organization without vested commercial interests. Transparency is to be maintained at all levels of functioning of the various agencies in the livestock production sector.

Montbeliarde breed - think twice

Introduction of Montbeliarde cattle in Kerala need consideration from various angles. If it is only few cattle embryos or few doses of semen brought for trial purpose it need not be projected as news. However large scale introduction should precede discussion at various levels.

Montbeliarde is same as Simmental breed, dual purpose and very profitable, in European conditions. The breed is specially preferred for making a particular cheese; cheese is a food item finding place over the dining table of every European – rich or poor.  The breed gives high quantity of quality meat apart from reasonable milk

What does Kerala need? W hat are the limitations of Kerala farmers in rearing cattle, its breeding, feeding, marketing of products etc? These aspects should be addressed and answers   analyzed before taking a long term policy of breed introduction. Also important is the availability of donor breed. Wider scale availability from various sources ensures continued and reliable genetic improvement.  No Indian state now needs to accept anything which is offered unlike in sixties.

Abraham Mathew

POOR FARMER

      Apreciate your valuable opinion. I am Dr. N.Sukesan.I hope u r Dr Mathew mash of old mattupetty. Where r u sir now. are  u fine?. I fully agree with your opinion. The present problem of a small farmer is not the  breed.Whatever may be the breed, it will not shower milk without feed. The cost of feed and income from milk is the real problem for which the Government must be able to find  a solution.Human food resourses must be protected, supported,maintained and  motivated by the government for the benefit of the whole population.Only possible way is to give feed  through rationshops on half price . Or give production based  subsidy which will be difficult to regulate as  milk sale otherthan through societies are not controlled. At present the choice is with the farmer to select the sector.A vet or agri is not the person to direct one. A professional can only motivate and render service as per the government  schemes.So a change of breed alone will not help the farmer. Dr. N.Sukesan.9447584955

What is the need of the hour

Yet another foreign tour for Minister and the MD. When the farmers are finding the milk price inadequte, the need of the hour is some feed subsidy, some measure to reduce the inter-calving period and better marketing facilities. Government can offfer subsidy , local bodies and co-ops can help them to find market . Only the vets can help them to reduce the dry period , if they sincerly learn and practice  A.I techniques.

    Have the KLDB done any home work about  adult animals of this breed before going for import of semen and embryos?like adaptabilty, incidence of diseases etc.HF brought Thilaria,foot problems and BS were more prone to cervicitis.

  This KLD board introduced embryo transfer many years ago and did they succeed in introducing at field level? Ofcourse this import will help someone if not the dairy farmers